Skip to content

The Local

The address Clinton

A city of twenty three thousand with no address system, no postcode and no named street of its own

Whose address is this, and why does everything you own think you live in Clearfield?

Query the state's own roads layer for every segment in Clinton and it returns 1,264 of them in a single group: address system Clearfield, postcode 84015, postal community Clearfield. Not one carries this city's name. That is not a mailing database being untidy, it is how the State of Utah describes the geography of a city of 23,386 people, and it is why every street here is a number and why the city's own utility page gives a Clearfield address for a building that is in Sunset. Five cities and 103,874 people share this grid.

By Scott Buehler, Moving Utah Updated August 2026

Clinton is at the top corner of Davis County, four hours and a mountain range from the ground I actually work, so these pages are researched rather than lived. What is on them was read where it is issued: the city's own facility records, history page, secondary water page, special events calendar and fire department pages at clintoncity.net, including its published insurance classification and the four orienteering course documents it hosts; the Utah State Historical Society's account of the town; the state roads layer and the municipal boundary layer at the Utah Geospatial Resource Center; the United States Census geocoder; and the Division of Wildlife Resources community fisheries list. Every figure carries the date it was checked. A Davis County partner agent takes the ground level work.

The live question


Is a house in Clinton actually in Clearfield, and why does every system say it is?

It is in Clinton, and every system says Clearfield because the street numbering itself is Clearfield's. This is settleable in one query. The Utah Geospatial Resource Center roads layer, queried on 20 August 2026 for every segment with Clinton on its left or right side, returns 1,264 segments. Grouped by address system and postcode, they come back as a single group: 1,264 segments, address system Clearfield, postcode 84015. Not one segment in the city carries a Clinton address system, a second postcode or a second postal community. The postal community field reads CLEARFIELD on every segment where it is populated at all.

That is a much bigger statement than a shared postcode. An address system is the grid a house number is measured from: the origin, the axes and the numbering convention. Clinton having none of its own is why every street inside the city limits is a number. The layer's full name list for the city returns 1300 North, 1800 North and 2300 North running east to west, 1000 West through 3000 West running north to south, and the outliers are numbers too, 2415 North at the pond, 1740 North at the Powerline park, 600 North at the City Gardens. The state's roads layer does not return a single named street inside this city apart from the token used for private drives.

The practical city guide describes this as a paperwork quirk rather than a boundary question. The postcode half of that is right and the framing is far too small. It is not a mailing database being untidy. It is how the State of Utah describes the geography of a city of 23,386 people, on every segment, in its authoritative roads layer, and it is why a buyer will see Clearfield on an insurance quote, a delivery app and a listing feed for a house that is unambiguously in a different municipality with a different mayor, a different police department and a different fire department.

One query, five cities

1,264

Clinton segments, and all of them Clearfield's

1

postcode in the entire city, 84015

5,676

segments across five cities on one address system

103,874

people on that grid at the 2020 census

The record


Five cities, one grid, and the city it is named for is not the biggest one on it.

The same query, run city by city against the state roads layer on 20 August 2026, produces the table below. Each row counts every segment where that city appears on the left or right side of the road, grouped by the address system and postcode the layer records. The Clinton row is the only one with a single group in it.

CityRoad segmentsAddress systems in usePostcodes in use
Clinton1,264Clearfield only, on every segment84015 only, on every segment
Syracuse1,842Clearfield on 1,834; Layton on 884075 on 1,785, plus 84015 on 49 and 84041 on 2
Clearfield1,540Clearfield on 1,516; Layton on 21; Hill Air Force Base on 384015 on 1,386, plus 84056 on 131, 84041 on 16 and 84075 on 4
West Point733Clearfield on every segment84015 on 675, plus 84075 on 47 and 84315 on 11
Sunset333Clearfield on 329; Hill Air Force Base on 484015 on 282 and 84056 on 51
Roy, across the north line1,885Ogden on 1,884; Clearfield on 184067 on 1,854, plus four others
Hooper, across the north line509Ogden on every segment84315 on 478, plus three others

Queried at the Utah Geospatial Resource Center UtahRoads feature service on 20 August 2026, counting segments where the named city appears in either the left or right municipality field and grouping by the left side address system and postcode fields. Summing the Clearfield system rows for the five Davis cities gives 5,676 segments; adding their 2020 decennial counts gives 103,874 people addressed from one origin. Both of those totals are this page's arithmetic on the layer's own output rather than figures the state publishes. The single Roy segment on the Clearfield system is the grid crossing the county line by one road.

What the table actually shows, in three sentences

First, Clinton is the purest case on the grid rather than an odd one. Every other city on the Clearfield address system has exceptions in it: base ground, a Layton edge, a surviving Hooper postcode, a boundary road numbered from somewhere else. Clinton has none. One system, one postcode, one postal community, 1,264 for 1,264.

Second, the grid is not a Clearfield thing so much as a northwest Davis thing that happens to be named for Clearfield. Syracuse is the largest city on it by segment count and by population; Clearfield is not even the largest contributor of segments. What the name records is where the origin sits, not who the grid belongs to.

Third, the north line does two jobs at once. It is the Davis and Weber county boundary and it is the edge of the address system, because Roy and Hooper are both numbered from Ogden. That is why the boundary reads so hard on the ground up there compared with the Sunset or Clearfield edges, where nothing changes at all when you cross.

The details

Where The north city line, best sampled at about longitude 112.066 west, where Clinton runs to latitude 41.1525 north and Roy begins by 41.1530. In street terms that is the top of the 1500 West alignment
From City Hall About half a mile north of 2267 North 1500 West, three or four minutes to drive or fifteen to walk. That is an estimate rather than a published figure
Season Year round. It is an ordinary residential street edge with no gate, no facility and nothing seasonal about it
Cost Nothing. There is no marker, no sign and no interpretation of any kind, which is rather the point
Time needed Fifteen minutes, and take a phone. The interesting part is watching the county and the address origin change under you while nothing on the street does

Getting there

From City Hall go north on 1500 West to the top of the grid. The transition between Clinton and Roy at that longitude happens inside about fifty five metres of latitude, between 41.1525 and 41.1530, which is roughly the width of a road and a verge. Further west, the neighbour on the far side changes from Roy to Hooper somewhere between longitude 112.084 and 112.082 west, which is around the 3000 West alignment, though the boundary data gives a longitude rather than a cross street, so the street name is an approximation.

Before you go

  • There is nothing to see. The value of the exercise is that a county line, a school district line, a dispatch boundary and an address system boundary all sit on one residential edge with no physical marker at all.
  • The east and southeast city lines are the opposite case. Nothing whatever changes at the Sunset or Clearfield boundary, because the grid and the postcode run straight across both.
  • Every boundary probe returns an incorporated city on both sides. There is no unincorporated buffer anywhere along the north line, unlike some other Davis and Weber seams.
  • If you are checking a specific parcel near this edge, the county recorder is the only authority. A postcode, a listing feed and a satellite photograph will all agree with each other and none of them settles it.

The proof


The city's own utility page files a building in Sunset under a Clearfield address.

If you want one piece of evidence that the shared address is a real thing rather than an abstraction, it is on the city's own website and it has been for years. Clinton's secondary water page, checked in August 2026, tells residents that the secondary water system is a privately owned utility operated and maintained by the Davis and Weber County Canal Company, and gives that company's contact block: a telephone number, and the postal address 138 West 1300 North, Clearfield, Utah 84015.

Put that address into the United States Census geocoder, benchmark Public_AR_Current and vintage Current_Current, and it matches at longitude 112.029424 west, latitude 41.132643 north, and returns the incorporated place as Sunset city, Davis County. Not Clearfield. The building is about a hundred metres east of Sunset City Hall on the same block of the same street. Checked in August 2026, and it matches what the company's own filings elsewhere say about where it is based.

So the city of Clinton publishes, on its own utility page, a Clearfield address for a building that is in Sunset, for the private company that supplies irrigation water to Clinton lawns. Nobody made an error. Sunset uses Clearfield's grid and Clearfield's postcode exactly as Clinton does, so the company's correct postal address names a city it is not in. Three municipalities, one address system, and the misfiling is not a mistake anybody can fix without changing the post office.

The same page has a smaller version of the problem inside a single paragraph. Its sentence calls the operator the Davis and Weber County Canal Company, singular, while its contact block calls it the Davis and Weber Counties Canal Company, plural. The company's own domain and its own name use the plural. It is a small thing and it is the same species of small thing: a name and an address that nobody can quite pin down because the underlying geography is shared out among several bodies.

A Clinton city web page gives a Clearfield address for a Sunset building, and every word of it is correct. That is what one shared address system does to three towns.

The line


Five neighbours in two counties, and not one metre of unincorporated ground between any of them.

The practical city guide says three separate times that Clinton touches four cities and a county line, and it then names Roy and Hooper in its own nearby list as places across the county line, which is the page contradicting itself. Point in polygon probes run against the state municipal boundary layer in August 2026 return five municipalities around this city: Sunset to the east, Clearfield to the southeast, West Point to the south and to the west, and Roy and Hooper along the north line, both in Weber County. The Weber County line is not an abstraction on the north edge. It is a shared city line, twice over.

The transitions are tight. At longitude 112.066 west, latitude 41.1525 returns Clinton and 41.1530 returns Roy, which is about fifty five metres. Sampled across the whole north edge, from longitude 112.100 to 112.040 west, latitude 41.1520 returns Clinton everywhere and 41.1545 returns Roy or Hooper everywhere, and not one probe in the set returned unincorporated ground. The Roy and Hooper handover on Clinton's north line falls between longitude 112.084 and 112.082 west, which in city terms is roughly the 3000 West alignment.

What that line actually changes is worth listing precisely, because it is easy to overstate. The address system changes, because Roy and Hooper are numbered from Ogden. The postcode changes, from 84015 to 84067 at Roy. The school district changes, from Davis to Weber. The county services change: the health department that samples this city's pond, the county library, the county fair and the county recreation arrangements are all Davis County's on the south side of that street. And on the Clinton side the after hours and non emergency number published in the footer of every page of the city site is Davis County Dispatch.

What it does not change, and this is the whole point of the page, is the address system on the Clinton side of it. Crossing the line into Roy changes the origin your house number is measured from. Crossing the line into Sunset or Clearfield does not, because it never was Clinton's origin in the first place. A resident here lives inside a boundary that is invisible in three directions and hard in one, and the hard one is the direction where the numbering changes rather than where the county does. Those happen to coincide, which is a coincidence of history rather than a rule.

One thing on this page is a dataset finding rather than a statement of law, and it should not be repeated as though it were codified. That the Davis and Weber county boundary is the city line here is what two state datasets show, consistently and at fine resolution, checked in August 2026. It is not a reading of the statutory boundary description in the Utah Code. The line at this longitude is a survey line rather than a river, so anybody who needs it as law rather than as a map should read the county boundary title in the code and check both county recorders. Separately, no published source describes a mutual aid, ambulance transport or cross county fire arrangement between Clinton and Roy or Hooper, and none should be assumed from adjacency; Clinton runs its own fire department and its own police department and a shared line is not a shared service.

Living with it


An address that names the wrong city on every form you will ever fill in.

For a household, this is a nuisance rather than a problem, and it is a permanent nuisance. Insurance quotes, delivery apps, listing feeds, directory entries, warranty registrations and school forms will all resolve the postcode and print Clearfield. Nobody has made a mistake and nothing can be corrected. If a form has a city field and a postcode field, the postcode is 84015 and the city is Clinton, and some systems will overwrite the second from the first. It is worth knowing that in advance rather than discovering it on a policy document.

Two consequences are worth actual money or actual time. The first is that anything priced or rated by municipality, which includes some insurance products and some service territories, needs the city confirmed rather than inferred from the post. The second is that a property near the Sunset or Clearfield edge cannot be assigned to a municipality by eye, by postcode or by a listing feed, because the grid and the postcode both run straight across those lines with no visible break in the street pattern. The county parcel record is the document that settles which city levies a property, whose general plan governs the lot next door and whose council hears an application on it.

The third consequence is the pleasant one. Because every street is a number measured from a known origin, this is one of the easiest cities in Utah to navigate without a map once you know the convention. The numbers rise going north and going west, the arterials fall on the section lines at 1300, 1800 and 2300 North and at 1000 through 3000 West, and any address in the city can be placed within a block by arithmetic. The trails page is built on the same grid logic, because the parks are strung along the alignments.

The last thing is a link rather than a claim. Syracuse, West Point, Clearfield and Sunset are all on this grid too, and each of those cities has or will have its own practical guide on this site with its own version of the same paperwork. This page is the one that carries the grid itself for the whole northwest corner of the county, and the county hub is where the shared subjects live.

Quick answers


The address grid, answered.

Because the entire street numbering system is Clearfield's, not just the postcode. Queried at the Utah Geospatial Resource Center roads layer on 20 August 2026, all 1,264 road segments in Clinton come back as one group: address system Clearfield, postcode 84015, postal community Clearfield. An address system is the origin a house number is measured from, so a Clinton house number is measured from a point in a different municipality. Insurance quotes, delivery apps, listing feeds and directory entries all resolve the postcode and print the postal community, and none of them is wrong.

No. They are separate municipalities with separate mayors, separate councils, separate general plans and separate police and fire arrangements, and Clinton runs both of its own. What they share is an address system and a postcode, which is a postal and geographic convention rather than a jurisdictional one. The two cities are not even directly adjacent along most of their frontage: the state boundary layer puts Clearfield at Clinton's southeast corner, with Sunset to the east and West Point to the south and west. A parcel near any of those edges should be confirmed at the county recorder rather than assumed from the post.

Five, and Clearfield is not the largest of them. Queried on 20 August 2026, the state roads layer files 1,264 of 1,264 Clinton segments, 1,834 of 1,842 Syracuse segments, 1,516 of 1,540 Clearfield segments, all 733 West Point segments and 329 of 333 Sunset segments under the address system Clearfield. Summing those gives 5,676 road segments; adding the five cities' 2020 decennial counts gives 103,874 people numbered from one origin. Syracuse contributes more segments than Clearfield does. Both totals are arithmetic on the layer's output rather than figures the state publishes.

Not in the state's roads layer. Pulling the full street name list for every segment inside the city on 20 August 2026 returns numbers and nothing else: 1300 North, 1800 North and 2300 North east to west, 1000 West through 3000 West north to south, and outliers like 2415 North at the pond and 600 North at the City Gardens, plus the token the layer uses for private drives. That is a direct consequence of an imported grid. The honest limit on the claim is that the query returns segments where Clinton is on the left or right side, so a cul de sac with a marketing name could in principle be attributed elsewhere.

Five, in two counties. Point in polygon probes against the state municipal boundary layer on 20 August 2026 return Sunset to the east, Clearfield to the southeast, West Point to the south and west, and Roy and Hooper across the north line, both in Weber County. No probe anywhere along the north edge returned unincorporated ground, so the county line there is a shared city line rather than a gap. The practical city guide says Clinton touches four cities and a county line in three places, while its own nearby list names Roy and Hooper, so the page disagrees with itself.

The address system, the postcode, the county and the school district, all at once and within about fifty five metres. Roy and Hooper are both numbered from the Ogden address system rather than the Clearfield one, the postcode goes from 84015 to 84067 at Roy, the county goes from Davis to Weber and the school district goes from Davis to Weber as well. Nothing changes at all at the Sunset or Clearfield edges, because the grid and the postcode run straight across both. No published source describes a mutual aid or ambulance arrangement across that line, so none should be assumed.

Because the address is correct and the city it names is not where the building is. Clinton's secondary water page publishes the Davis and Weber Counties Canal Company at 138 West 1300 North, Clearfield, Utah 84015. Run that through the United States Census geocoder and it matches at longitude 112.029424 west, latitude 41.132643 north, and returns the incorporated place as Sunset city, Davis County, about a hundred metres from Sunset City Hall. Sunset uses Clearfield's grid and postcode exactly as Clinton does, so a correct postal address names a city the building is not in. Checked 20 August 2026.

No. Every road segment in the city carries 84015, which is Clearfield's, and there is no second postcode anywhere inside the boundary. That makes Clinton the cleanest case on the whole grid: Sunset carries two postcodes because some of its ground is inside an installation, West Point carries three including a surviving Hooper one, Syracuse carries four and Clearfield itself carries four. Clinton has exactly one and it belongs to somebody else. Verified at the Utah Geospatial Resource Center roads layer on 20 August 2026.

The county parcel record, and nothing else. The postcode does not follow the city line, the street grid does not change at the Sunset or Clearfield boundary, and there is no visible break in the street pattern at either. That means a listing feed, a delivery driver, a directory entry and a search engine can all place a property in the wrong municipality without anybody having made an error. Which city a parcel sits in decides who levies it, whose general plan governs the lot next door, whose council hears an application on it and which set of city rules applies. Settle it at Davis County before a transaction.

Scott Buehler, Moving Utah

One query, 1,264 segments, and an answer that is not this city's name.

This is the single most consequential thing about a Clinton address and it is also the least visible. The numbers on the door are measured from another city's origin, the post office calls the whole of it something else, every form you fill in for the next decade will resolve the postcode and print the wrong municipality, and none of it can be fixed. What it means in practice is small and specific: confirm the city rather than infer it, use the county parcel record anywhere near a boundary, and expect a permanent low level of paperwork friction. Tell me which streets you are weighing and I will introduce you to a Davis County partner agent who can run those checks with you, and stay on the file for the financing side.

Referral disclosure. Outside Southern Utah, I connect home sellers and buyers with partner agents I trust in their area. If you choose to work with an agent I refer, that agent's brokerage pays my brokerage (Real Broker, LLC) a referral fee. The fee comes out of the agent's compensation; it is not an added cost to you. You are always free to choose any agent you wish, and using a referred agent is never required.