Skip to content

The Local

The bluff Washington Terrace

Two hundred feet down to the Weber River in a quarter of a kilometre, with no public path, stair or overlook anywhere on that edge

The bluff, and the way down that exists only on paper.

Washington Terrace sits on flat ground between roughly 4,590 and 4,660 feet, and the Weber River bottoms along its west and south edges run roughly 4,370 to 4,440. The fall between them is about two hundred feet and it happens in a quarter of a kilometre. There is no public path, stair, ramp or road down it, and the city's own trails page names zero trails. What exists is a plan the council took by motion in September 2025, which proposes a descent from Rohmer Park, notes that it requires private property acquisition, and scores it near the bottom of the city's own priority table.

By Scott Buehler, Moving Utah Updated August 2026

I hold my licence and do my daily work at the far south end of Utah, roughly three hundred miles from this bench, so these pages are researched rather than lived. The bodies behind them are named against every figure: Washington Terrace City's own history, parks, trails, events, fire, public safety, senior centre and economic development pages; the 123 page Active Transportation Plan the city publishes and the 69 page General Plan revised in 2022; the council agenda, staff report and work session minutes posted on the Utah Public Notice Website; the toll road operator's own rate page; the hospital operator's own facility page; Weber School District and the Utah State Board of Education October enrolment file; the Weber County Library System; the Utah State Tax Commission; the Utah Department of Workforce Services; the Utah Population Committee; the Census Bureau's boundary file, geocoder and American Community Survey; the Utah Geospatial Resource Center; and the federal elevation and hydrography services. Every figure carries the day it was read. A Weber and Morgan partner agent takes the ground level work.

The short answer

There is no public path, stair, ramp or road from Washington Terrace down the bluff to the Weber River. The city publishes none, and its own city trails page names zero trails of any kind. What exists instead is a plan: the Active Transportation Plan the city council took by motion on 16 September 2025 proposes a shared use path from Rohmer Park down toward the river, calls it the Stevens Pathway, notes in its own project table that it requires multi jurisdictional coordination and private property acquisition, and scores it 8.1 against a top score of 15.31 for a corridor the city already has. The General Plan revised 2022 separately names a future Terrace Bluff Trail and says the city would have to annex land to build along the river. Checked 22 August 2026.

Where The city's west and south edges. The built ground runs flat between roughly 4,590 and 4,660 feet; the Weber River bottoms below it run roughly 4,370 to 4,440. Rohmer Park at 5100 South 650 West, at 4,612 feet, sits at the top of the slope the plan calls the Rohmer Park hill
The fall About 190 feet in 250 metres on a west transect at roughly the latitude of Rohmer Park, then flat river bottoms for a kilometre. About 220 feet in 400 metres on a south transect off the city's high southern ground. Both measured on the federal elevation service, 22 August 2026
Season Not applicable, because there is nothing seasonal to open or close. No public trail, trailhead, overlook or river access exists on the Washington Terrace side to be maintained, gated or plowed
Cost Nothing, because there is nothing to charge for. The city's adopted plan states that adopting it does not create an immediate fiscal impact, and the only line the city manager told the council was already in a budget was street striping on one road
Status Planned, not built, and ranked low by the city's own arithmetic. Four of the plan's proposed paths touch the bluff or the river and they score 8.1, 6.5, 3.1 and 1.5, the last being the lowest score in the whole prioritisation table

The live question


Can you walk down to the river, and if not, when will you be able to?

No, and the second half of the question has an unusually precise answer for something unbuilt: not soon, on the city's own scoring. Five city surfaces were checked on 22 August 2026 for any descent off the bluff, the parks page, the city trails page, the parks and recreation index, the parks master plan landing page and the Active Transportation Plan itself, and none of them carries a stair, a path, a ramp or a public road going down. The plan treats a Rohmer Park to river connection as something to be built, which is direct evidence that it was not there when the plan was written.

The city trails page is worth quoting in full because it is so short. It reads: There are many great routes that can be used to experience Washington Terrace City. Here are some potential walking/running/biking routes that you might enjoy. They vary in length and showcase a variety of interesting city features including parks, schools, neighborhoods, or the entire Terrace. That is the entire published text. No trail is named, no map is linked, no document is attached, and the Weber River is not mentioned. A city page headed City Trails that names zero trails is not a gap in this research; it is the finding.

What the city does publish about the slope is unambiguous and it comes from its own adopted plan. In the plan's slope and topography section: portions of the study area have very hilly terrain with especially significant slopes alongside the Weber River and the Bonneville Shoreline bench. In these areas, slope grades are in excess of 20% and in some places approach grades of 50%. The same page notes that grades greater than 5% on on-street facilities are classified as undesirable under the 2012 AASHTO guidance, and that finding roads that circumnavigate steeper areas via switchbacks, curves, or avoidance will be key to creating a successful active transportation network.

And the county has said the same thing in a different register. The General Plan revised 2022 records that the Weber County Planning Commission has a geologist on staff who identified the Weber River bluff and slope areas north, south, and west of the City as potentially sensitive areas to development, and that the city has adopted sensitive area regulations requiring landowners to provide geological analysis by experts before building there. Two public bodies, one landform, and both of them describing it as a constraint rather than an amenity.

The landform, measured


Two hundred feet down in a quarter of a kilometre, and then a kilometre of flat river bottoms.

A transect stepping west across the city boundary at roughly the latitude of Rohmer Park, sampling the federal elevation service every hundred and twenty five metres, reads 4,572 feet inside the city, 4,488 at the city boundary itself, 4,381 below the bank, and then 4,378, 4,370, 4,383, 4,376 and 4,377 across a kilometre of river bottoms. That is a fall of about 190 feet inside 250 metres followed by ground that does not move. A second transect stepping south off the city's high southern ground reads 4,656, 4,644, 4,564, 4,436 at the city's own southern tip, then 4,446, 4,424 and 4,429 below. That is about 220 feet in 400 metres. Both were sampled on 22 August 2026.

Those two profiles explain the shape of the city better than any description of it does. The built ground is genuinely flat: City Hall reads 4,628 feet, Rohmer Park 4,612, Bonneville High School 4,591, and the high ground near the south end 4,656, a spread of sixty five feet across a whole city. The corners are where it drops. The north tip reads 4,502, the west edge 4,490 and the south tip 4,436. A city that is level everywhere it is built and falls two hundred feet at two of its edges is a city whose street grid was always going to stop where it does.

The last measurement is the one that settles a common misreading. The closest the Washington Terrace municipal boundary comes to the Weber River centreline is twenty nine metres, at exactly one vertex, its southernmost. Thirty eight of the city's 506 boundary vertices lie within four hundred metres of the river and 191 lie within eight hundred, and the Census Bureau's 2024 boundary file assigns the city zero square metres of water. This city has a river corner, not a river frontage, and the trail on the water belongs to the city on the far bank.

The bluff, in numbers

about 200 ft

of fall between the built bench and the river bottoms, on the federal elevation service

250 m

the distance the west transect takes to lose 190 feet of it

29 m

the closest the city boundary comes to the river centreline, at exactly one of 506 vertices

0

public paths, stairs, overlooks or river access points the city publishes on that edge

The plan, and what it scored


Four barriers, two of them this city's own edges, and four proposed paths that scored 8.1, 6.5, 3.1 and 1.5.

The Washington Terrace Active Transportation Plan runs to 123 pages, was prepared by Alta Planning and Design for Riverdale, South Ogden and Washington Terrace jointly under a 2019 grant through the Wasatch Front Regional Council, and went to this city's council on 16 September 2025 as agenda item 7.3. Its recommendations were developed independently for each of the three cities; only the existing conditions analysis was shared. Everything below is quoted or tabulated from the plan itself.

Start with the barriers, because the plan states them as a list and two of the four are this city's own edges. In its own words: Major gaps and barriers in the study area's active transportation network include: Riverdale Road; The Rohmer Park hill; East-west connections across the Weber River; US Route 89. Riverdale Road is a Riverdale street and US Route 89 runs along the eastern side of the study area. The Rohmer Park hill and the river crossings are Washington Terrace's own problem, named by the city's own consultant in the city's own adopted document.

The plan then explains the mechanism, again in its own words: the railroad tracks, Weber River, and the Bonneville Shoreline bench constitute a significant barrier between Riverdale and Washington Terrace, which is exacerbated by the fact that Riverdale Road is one of the only corridors that connects the two communities. And elsewhere: There are no major north-south or east-west active transportation connectors within this area, showing that notable barriers currently exist for those bicyclists and pedestrians desiring to travel in or through these cities. A photograph caption puts it plainest of all: the degree of slope on this hill near Rohmer Park may present a barrier to some bicyclists and pedestrians if a pathway were to be developed.

Then come the projects. The plan proposes six shared use paths for Washington Terrace, totalling 1.7 miles across six segments, alongside 5.1 miles of bicycle boulevard across eleven segments and 5.3 miles of bike lane across another eleven, plus six corridors flagged for future study. Four of the six shared use paths touch the bluff, the river or the hospital ground beside them, and the plan's own notes on them are the most candid thing in the document.

The plan's IDCorridor, start to endLengthThe plan's own noteIts own priority score
SUP-2Stevens Pathway, Rohmer Park to Adams Avenue Parkway0.6 mileDevelop shared use path connecting Rohmer Park and the Weber River Parkway to the Adams Ave Parkway. Requires multi jurisdictional coordination and private property acquisition8.1
SUP-6Rohmer Park roadway, the gate to 5400 South0.6 mileDevelop shared use path along Rohmer Park roadway to connect the Weber River Parkway trail to neighborhoods6.5
SUP-5West of Ogden Regional Medical Center, Ridgeline Drive to 5600 South0.4 mileDevelop shared use path to the west of the Ogden Regional Medical Center. This path will also promote economic development in the area and is in line with the Medical Center's plans3.1
SUP-1Powerline easement, 5600 South to the Stevens Pathway0.1 mileDevelop shared use path connection from the medical center to the proposed Stevens Pathway1.5, the lowest score in the table
SUP-3Van Lewen Park connector, 4600 South to the park0.3 mileDevelop shared use path connection from park to school. Minimum 10 foot width. Requires coordination with adjacent property owners. May require easement acquisitionnot among the four bluff and river items
SUP-4Washington Boulevard, 375 East to the boulevard0.03 mileImprove pavement condition and signage. Add lighting. Widen, if possiblenot among the four bluff and river items

Project identifiers, corridors, lengths and notes taken verbatim from Appendix A, Table A.1 of the Washington Terrace Active Transportation Plan, read 22 August 2026. Scores come from the same appendix's weighted prioritisation table. The park name in SUP-3 is spelled Van Lewen in the plan's table and George Van-Leeuwen on the city's parks page; both spellings are the city's own. For comparison, the highest scoring Washington Terrace items in that same table are the Adams Avenue Parkway and Highway 89 corridor at 15.31, a 5000 South future study at 13.51, and bicycle boulevards on two of the city's east to west streets at 13.41 and 11.81.

Read plainly, the city's own adopted plan puts the way down the bluff at the bottom of its own list. That is not a criticism and it is not a prediction; it is what a weighted scoring table produced when the consultant applied it, and it is the most honest available answer to the question of when there will be a path to the river. The four items that touch the bluff and the river occupy four of the lowest positions, and the item that scores highest in the whole city is a corridor that already exists and needs improving rather than building.

The public asked for something different, and the plan records that too. The recommended route that received the most support in the public mapping exercise was a shared use path along US Route 89 with thirteen likes, followed by a shared use path connecting Riverdale and Washington Terrace along the bluff with six, separated bike lanes along Riverdale Road with five, a path along Burch Creek in South Ogden with five, bike lanes on Glasmann Way with four and a path along the Davis-Weber Canal with four. But the two highest counts anywhere in the exercise were not routes at all: two grade separated crossings, at the railroad tracks with twenty one likes and at the Weber River with seventeen, which the plan says would allow residents to more easily travel to and from Washington Terrace.

The details

Where The Rohmer Park hill, on the west side of Rohmer Park at 5100 South 650 West, at the top of the fall between the built bench at about 4,612 feet and the river bottoms at about 4,378
From City Hall City Hall at 5249 South 400 East is about a thousand address units east of the park on the city's own grid. No public body publishes a distance or a drive time inside this city and none is printed here
Season The park is open year round and the slope below it is not public ground. No seasonal access, gate or closure exists to publish because no public route exists
Cost Nothing. The park is free and no fee, permit or reservation attaches to the hill. The plan states that its own adoption does not create an immediate fiscal impact
Time needed Minutes, and they are minutes spent at the top. The plan's own proposed descent from this park is 0.6 mile and is unbuilt, and the ground between the park and the water is not a public route

Getting there

Rohmer Park is reached from inside the city on ordinary city streets, and it is the venue the city uses for Terrace Days, the June film and the Easter egg hunt. The hill is the western edge of the park rather than a separate destination, and the city's own description of the park mentions a large hill area and walking trails around the park without making any claim about a view or an overlook.

Before you go

  • There is no public way down from here. The plan's proposed path is unbuilt, and its own note says it requires multi jurisdictional coordination and private property acquisition.
  • The slope is not a walking surface. The city's own plan puts grades on this ground in excess of twenty percent and in places approaching fifty.
  • The ground below and beyond the city boundary is another city's, and the trail on the water is published and maintained by that city and by the regional trail organisation, not by Washington Terrace.
  • The city makes no view claim about this park. If a listing or a walking application describes an overlook here, it is not repeating anything the city has published.

Do not go looking for a way down. There is not one, and the ground either side of the city line is neither public nor walkable. Every route down this bluff that appears in the city's own adopted plan is a proposal, and the plan says of the main one that it requires multi jurisdictional coordination and private property acquisition. The slope itself carries grades the plan puts above twenty percent and in places near fifty, and the Weber County Planning Commission's staff geologist identified the bluff and the slope areas north, south and west of the city as potentially sensitive areas to development, which is why the city adopted sensitive area regulations covering them. The city publishes no trailhead, no path and no river access on this side. Anybody wanting to walk beside the Weber River should start from a published trailhead on the far bank, which the guide to the two river parkways sets out with the owning body named against each one.

What was said, and when


A city manager naming the obstacle in a work session, and a council taking the plan by motion two weeks later.

The clearest statement anybody has made about this gap was made out loud, in a council work session on 2 September 2025, and it survives in minutes included in the 16 September 2025 council packet on the Utah Public Notice Website. City Manager Tom Hanson is recorded saying that he, Riverdale, and South Ogden, have been working on the tri-city transportation master plan for several years, that he recognizes that there are barriers and challenges to alternate transportation routes, and that a shared paved path between the cities have been studied. Then the sentence that names the obstacle: Hanson stated that he would like to see a trail linking Rohmer Park to the nature park train in South Ogden. He stated that there is a section of land that is not owned by the city.

The word train there is the minute taker's slip for trail, and the substance is unmistakable. Five years after a newspaper first reported the three cities studying east to west connections, the person responsible for delivering it names the reason it has not happened, and the reason is land the city does not own. The same minutes record him saying he does not know South Ogden's plan for a crossover between South Ogden and Washington Terrace, and that this version of the plan is not set in stone and is a working document.

Two weeks later the council took the item. The agenda for the regular meeting of Tuesday 16 September 2025 at 5249 South 400 East carries item 7.3 as a discussion and motion, approval of the Washington Terrace City Active Transportation Plan, described as approval of the Washington Terrace City contribution to the tri-city Active Transportation Plan with Riverdale City and South Ogden City. Items 7.1 and 7.2 that night carried resolution numbers, a budget amendment and an election cancellation. Item 7.3 carried none. The staff report inside the packet, written by Tom Hanson and dated 9-16-25, recommends adoption of the plan to strengthen community connections and provide expanded transportation options for residents, and states that the adoption of the Active Transportation Plan does not create an immediate fiscal impact. It also notes that due to the volume of the document the plan was not included in the packet.

One qualification belongs here rather than in a footnote. The agenda, the staff report and the work session minutes are all first party documents on a state notice site and were read directly. The vote itself was not: no approved minutes of the 16 September 2025 meeting were located in this research, and the next packet pulled from the notice site, for 19 May 2026, does not contain them. The city continues to publish the plan on a page inviting residents to review it, which is consistent with adoption without being proof of it. So the honest formulation is that the plan went to council as a motion on that date and the city has behaved since as though it passed.

The details

Where The Stevens Pathway, as the plan names it, running 0.6 mile from Rohmer Park at 5100 South 650 West toward Adams Avenue Parkway. It is the only named future trail in the Active Transportation Plan and the name appears nowhere else
From City Hall It would begin at Rohmer Park, about a thousand address units west of City Hall at 5249 South 400 East on the city's grid, and end on the corridor City Hall sits beside
Season None. There is nothing on the ground. The plan describes a facility to be developed and the city publishes no design, no alignment map and no construction schedule
Cost Not published. No cost estimate for this project appears in the material read, and the staff report states the plan's adoption carries no immediate fiscal impact
Time needed Unknown, and the plan's own scoring is the best available guide: 8.1 for this path against 15.31 for the corridor at the top of the same table

Getting there

The Stevens Pathway is a line in an appendix rather than a place. Nothing in this research established who or what Stevens is, or whether the corridor has any legal existence as an easement, a dedication or a platted right of way. The name appears twice in the plan's project table and once, spelled Stevens Pathways, in the prioritisation table, and in no other document read.

Before you go

  • This is a proposal, not a route. Do not plan a walk around it and do not treat a plan line as a trail on a map.
  • The plan's own note says it requires multi jurisdictional coordination and private property acquisition, which is the same obstacle the city manager named on the record.
  • The General Plan revised 2022 separately names a future Terrace Bluff Trail and says the city has the potential to annex and develop trail facilities along the Weber River Corridor. Annexation is the word the city itself used.
  • The city has not adopted a complete streets policy. The plan states, in its own words, that Washington Terrace has not adopted such a policy.

Living with it


A river two hundred feet below the garden fence, and a twenty minute drive to reach it.

The practical version of this for a household is short. If walking to a river matters, this city does not offer it and will not offer it soon on its own published scoring. What it offers instead is proximity without access: a corridor that is genuinely close in a straight line, genuinely level once you are on it, and reachable only by driving round through a neighbouring city to a published trailhead there. That is a real trade rather than a defect, and it is one worth making consciously rather than discovering after an offer.

The corridor itself is well documented, just not by this city. The trail on the water below, its owners, its surfaces, its parking and its flood repairs are set out in the guide to the two river parkways, which carries the whole Weber County reach with the issuing body named against each fact, and the Davis County end of the same river has its own page one county upstream. Neither of those is repeated here, deliberately: this page owns the rim and the plan, and the water belongs to the pages that own the water.

The other half of the trade is what the bluff does for the city that sits on top of it. Two of its four edges are landform rather than neighbour, which is why a city of two square miles borders only two municipalities and why the built ground is level almost everywhere. It is also why the county planning commission's geologist flagged the slope and why the city regulates building on it. A parcel near the western or southern edge is a different proposition from one in the middle of the grid, and the questions it raises are geological and regulatory rather than recreational. The page on moving here sets out the rest of what an address in this city asks.

What the public actually asked for

The plan's public mapping exercise ran in two phases, the first for six weeks collecting almost 100 points and lines, the second posted in both English and Spanish. The two highest support counts in the whole exercise were not for routes. They were for two grade separated crossings, one at the railroad tracks with twenty one likes and one at the Weber River with seventeen, which the plan says would allow residents to more easily travel to and from Washington Terrace.

Neither is funded and neither is built. The most supported route, a shared use path along US Route 89, drew thirteen likes; the path connecting Riverdale and Washington Terrace along the bluff drew six. Those are small numbers from a small exercise and they are what exists, and the shape they make is unambiguous: the thing people here asked for most was a way across, and it is the thing that is not there.

The city's own consultant listed four barriers in the study area and two of them are this city's own edges. That is not a criticism of the plan. That is the plan being honest.

Quick answers


The bluff, answered.

No. Checked on 22 August 2026, the city's parks page, its city trails page, its parks and recreation index, its parks master plan landing page and its own Active Transportation Plan carry no stair, path, ramp or public road descending the bluff, and the plan treats a Rohmer Park to river connection as a project to be built. The city trails page names no trail at all: its entire published text invites residents to enjoy potential walking, running and biking routes around city features, without naming one. There is no published overlook, no trailhead and no river access on the Washington Terrace side.

The city's own adopted plan says slope grades in these areas are in excess of 20% and in some places approach grades of 50%, and notes that grades above 5% on on-street facilities are classified as undesirable under 2012 AASHTO guidance. Measured independently on the federal elevation service on 22 August 2026, a transect west across the city boundary near Rohmer Park falls from 4,572 feet to 4,381 in about 250 metres, and a transect south off the city's high southern ground falls about 220 feet in 400 metres. Below that, the river bottoms run essentially flat for a kilometre.

A name in the City of Washington Terrace General Plan, revised 2022, and nowhere else. The plan's parks, recreation and trails element says the City has the potential to annex and develop trail facilities along the Weber River Corridor and also include the future Terrace Bluff Trail, that the city should continue to promote trails and pathways to connect with the proposed trail, that much of this trail has already been completed in neighboring communities, and that the city is working with regional bodies, the transportation department, Riverdale and South Ogden on regional trails. Nothing is built and no alignment is published.

The name the city's Active Transportation Plan gives to a proposed 0.6 mile shared use path connecting Rohmer Park and the river corridor to Adams Avenue Parkway, and the only named future trail in the document. The plan's own note on it reads that it requires multi jurisdictional coordination and private property acquisition. In the plan's weighted prioritisation table it scores 8.1, against 15.31 for the Adams Avenue Parkway and Highway 89 corridor at the top of the same table. Nothing in this research established who or what Stevens is, or whether the corridor has any legal existence.

It went to the city council on Tuesday 16 September 2025 as agenda item 7.3, a discussion and motion, described as approval of the Washington Terrace City contribution to the tri-city Active Transportation Plan with Riverdale City and South Ogden City. Items 7.1 and 7.2 that evening carried resolution numbers; item 7.3 carried none. The agenda and the staff report, written by City Manager Tom Hanson and dated 9-16-25, are posted on the Utah Public Notice Website. No approved minutes recording the vote were located in this research, so the date is the date the item was taken rather than a confirmed vote.

Barely, and not in a way that gives it anything. The closest the city's municipal boundary comes to the Weber River centreline is twenty nine metres, at exactly one of its 506 boundary vertices, its southernmost. Thirty eight vertices lie within four hundred metres of the river and 191 within eight hundred, and the Census Bureau's 2024 boundary file assigns the city zero square metres of water. That is a corner rather than a frontage. The bank, the trail on it and everything published about them belong to the city on the far side and to the regional trail organisation.

Because it does not own the land, and the city manager said so on the record. Work session minutes of 2 September 2025, included in the 16 September council packet, record Tom Hanson saying he would like to see a trail linking Rohmer Park to the nature park trail in South Ogden, and that there is a section of land that is not owned by the city. The plan's own project note says the same thing in planning language: requires multi jurisdictional coordination and private property acquisition. The General Plan goes further and says the city has the potential to annex land along the river corridor.

Two crossings, ahead of every route. The plan records that the recommended spot improvements receiving the most support were two grade separated crossings, at the railroad tracks with twenty one likes and at the Weber River with seventeen, which it says would allow residents to more easily travel to and from Washington Terrace. Those were the two highest counts anywhere in the exercise. Among routes, a shared use path along US Route 89 drew thirteen, and the path connecting Riverdale and Washington Terrace along the bluff drew six. The mapping ran in two phases, the second posted in English and Spanish.

The plan lists them as a bulleted set: Riverdale Road; The Rohmer Park hill; East-west connections across the Weber River; US Route 89. Two of those four are Washington Terrace's own edges. The plan explains the mechanism in its own words, that the railroad tracks, Weber River, and the Bonneville Shoreline bench constitute a significant barrier between Riverdale and Washington Terrace, made worse because Riverdale Road is one of the only corridors that connects the two communities. Elsewhere it states there are no major north-south or east-west active transportation connectors within this area.

Scott Buehler, Moving Utah

A river you can see and a plan that says the way down needs somebody else's land.

This is the page in the Washington Terrace companion that answers with a no, and the no is worth having early. There is no public route from this city down to the Weber River, the city's own consultant named the slope as one of four barriers in the study area, and the city's own scoring puts every proposed fix in the bottom half of its own table. What that means for a household is a driving trip to a published trailhead on the far bank rather than a walk from the door, and a different set of questions entirely for any parcel near the western or southern edge, where the county's geologist flagged sensitive slope ground and the city now regulates it. Tell me which streets you are weighing and I will introduce you to a Weber and Morgan partner agent who knows which side of this city an address sits on, and stay on the file for the financing side.

Referral disclosure. Outside Southern Utah, I connect home sellers and buyers with partner agents I trust in their area. If you choose to work with an agent I refer, that agent's brokerage pays my brokerage (Real Broker, LLC) a referral fee. The fee comes out of the agent's compensation; it is not an added cost to you. You are always free to choose any agent you wish, and using a referred agent is never required.