Cherry Hill, and the city line that runs down the middle of Main Street.

Fruit Heights. The Davis County Assessor's parcel record for 1325 South Main Street returns parcel 080320100 with a city field reading Fruit Heights, and that field is the county's own tax roll answer to which municipality a property sits in. The Census Bureau geocoder returns Fruit Heights city for the address, and returns Fruit Heights city again for a coordinate taken at the parcel's own centroid. The Utah Geospatial Resource Center municipal boundary layer returns Fruit Heights at that same point. All four were checked on 15 August 2026 and all four agree.

Because that is its mailing address, and it is correct. The postcode 84037 belongs to Kaysville, and Fruit Heights has no postcode of its own, so the postal address of record for every property in this city reads Kaysville. A business does not choose its mailing city; the postal service does. What is genuinely interesting is that the operator's own printed brochure gives Fruit Heights while its website gives Kaysville, so its two published materials disagree with each other, and the county parcel roll agrees with the brochure. Nobody here has made a mistake.

Down Main Street, on an odd and even split. Seven parcel records queried along that stretch on 15 August 2026 show the pattern cleanly: 1234, 1248 and 1322 South Main are even numbered, on the west side, and return Kaysville; 1207, 1225, 1235 and 1325 South Main are odd numbered, on the east side, and return Fruit Heights. Probe points run north along that same line return Fruit Heights well above the Cherry Hill parcel, so the city extends a considerable distance up the east side of Main Street. For a transaction, confirm at the county rather than from any description.

The Davis County parcel record carries three parcels for it, 080320143, 080320100 and 080320134, running to roughly 19.8 acres together. In a city of 2.29 square miles that is a substantial single block, and it is the largest contiguous piece of the old orchard ground in Fruit Heights that never became housing. The operator's own brochure gives 120 campsites, which corrects a figure of 180 that circulates in directory listings and does not come from the operator. Acreages and parcel numbers are updated on the county roll, so confirm there before relying on them.

For a household nearby, yes. The municipality decides which city levies the property, which general plan and zoning ordinance govern what can be built beside it, which council hears an application, which agency answers a call and which set of city rules applies to a permit. The postcode decides only where the post goes. Because Fruit Heights contracts its policing to the Davis County Sheriff's Office and its fire cover to the Kaysville Fire Department, some of those answers point at Kaysville anyway, which is exactly why the underlying municipal question is worth settling rather than assuming.

Because of how street address geocoding works. The Census Bureau geocoder's address endpoint returns the correct city name for 1325 South Main Street, but the coordinate it hands back with that answer is interpolated from the street's address range rather than measured, and for this address it lands about 260 metres south of the real parcel. Run a boundary query at that interpolated point and it falls inside Farmington, which is a third city and wrong twice over. The fix is to take the parcel geometry from the county layer and probe its actual centroid.

Orchard. The site sits on the bench that carried fruit trees from about 1850, in a city that took the name Fruit Heights in 1939 because of the fruit industry, and it is the largest surviving block of that farm ground inside the city that never became streets. What happened to the rest of it is visible in the city's own population figures: 175 residents in 1960, 2,731 by 1980. This page does not cover the attraction's prices, seasons or opening days, all of which belong to the operator and are carried, with the date they were read, on the county's family weekends page.

No, and it is the single most common trip planning mistake made about this place. The site is closed on Sundays, and that holds across its season rather than applying to a few dates. Beyond that, every price, pass type, opening date and closing date is the operator's own, all of it changed within the last year, and none of it is printed on this page on purpose. Read the current card at the operator before driving, and treat the county's family weekends page as a dated snapshot of what was published rather than as a live schedule.

One notable one, running in the opposite direction. The trail commonly called the Fruit Heights Upper Terrace Trail, along the old lake terrace above town toward Bair Canyon, is published by Farmington Parks and Recreation rather than by Fruit Heights. This companion carries no page on it, because every distance and gain figure for it traces to a crowd sourced app, the figures in circulation disagree, and the Farmington page that would settle the jurisdiction serves a security certificate issued for a different website and will not load. One asset with a neighbour's postbox, one with a neighbour's publisher.